frontiers in oncology predatory

Poor Peer Review Practices. As shown in Figure 1, the number of articles published in 2019 in each journal varied highly, ranging from 226 in Vaccines to 7,414 in Sustainability. 's (2019) definition. By 2019, 106,152 articles had been published in its 218 journals, an increase of 64.1% over 2018. Furthermore, no less importantly, the analysis showed that a large number of the citations that they receive are from other MDPI-journals. 2019) and therefore jeopardize integrity in science. All journals published by a predatory publisher are potentially predatory unless stated otherwise. The Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) had 53 journals ranked in the 2018 JCRs annual report. The list of criteria was created after considering which information could be objectively collected and compared across journals and which may fit the suggestion by the above sources that predatory journals do not follow best publication practices. It is well known that the direct relation between income and the number of manuscripts that are accepted prompts predatory journals to conduct cursory peer reviews, in such a way that the rejection rate is minimal, so that ample economic returns are still guaranteed (Beall, 2016; Frandsen, 2017). In 2019, almost all 53 MDPI-journals under analysis had intra-MDPI citation rates well above 20% (all except Universe11.87% and Catalysts18.73%), reaching values as high as 56.94% in Electronics, 51.07% in the IJGI, 47.56% in Remote Sensing, and 46.55% in Sustainability (Table 3). (2019): predatory journals and publishers are entities that prioritize self-interest at the expense of scholarship and are characterized by false or misleading information, deviation from best editorial and publication practices, a lack of transparency, and/or the use of aggressive and indiscriminate solicitation practices. The didactic explanation of Broome was as follows: The speed to publication for reputable journals is certainly longer with time from submission to first decision by the editor ranging from 4 to 12 weeks for most journals and varies even by article. For example, they no longer have webs with typographic errors, but with a much more sophisticated appearance, converting themselves into a non-evident/hidden predatory publisher, in view of their editorial behaviour. JCR-indexed MDPI-journals in (2018) and ranking/leading journal in the category. This investigation is centred on Clarivate's JCR, perhaps the most prestigious and best recognized database in academia with the widest use at a global level, in order to analyse the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). Frontiers is merely a symptom of an utterly rotten scholarly publishing system, which is beyond repair. mimicking names. 2020). Data were collected between 2 December 2019 and 4 January 2020. 2020). Frontiers is based in Lausanne, Switzerland, with other offices in London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels. A predatory journal will exploit this model to its own benefit with an inexistent or practically inexistent peer-review process (Beall 2015; Frandsen 2017; Demir 2018), which permits the rapid publication of academic papers without due guarantees, with an associated risk to the quality of the published science. In addition, publication in a predatory journal implies the possible squandering of valuable resources: people, animals, and money, as Moher et al. First, a proper systematic and structured overview of APC rates it is not available. Rotten System. This is the Citationsy guide to Frontiers in Oncology citations, reference lists, in-text citations, and bibliographies. Selective databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, and Journal Citation Reports (JCRs), form an index of journals, a sort of whitelist that is used for the purposes of assessing researchers and taking decisions on grant funding (Cortegiani et al. 2019). Besides, an increasingly high rate of citations from other MDPI-journals was observed. Assistant Field Chief Editor. 2020b), PubMed (Manca et al. The easiest way is to use a reference manager: The citation style is built in and you can choose it in Settings > Citation Style or Paperpile > Citation Style in Google Docs. Comparable data from other publishing houses, which they rarely publish as aggregate figures, would be of interest, without which any comparison is impossible. Data on each selected journal were gathered from the following sections of the MDPI-journal web pages: Home, Editorial Board, Special Issues, APC, and Journal Statistics. Likewise, Cabells blacklist and whitelist, now referred to as predatory journals and analytics https://blog.cabells.com/2020/06/08/announcement/, listed more than 12,000 predatory journals in October 2019 (https://blog.cabells.com/2019/10/02/the-journal-blacklist-surpasses-the-12000-journals-listed-mark/). Frederic was setting up a new, online, open access, peer reviewed . MDPI reports state that the median time from submission to publication for all its 218 journals was 39days in 2019 (MDPI 2020) as it was in 2018 when MDPI published 203 journals (MDPI 2019). In JCR-indexed MDPI-journals, if the trend of increasing numbers of published articles in all journals continues into 2020 and taking into account the generalized rise in the APC for 2020, MDPI may reasonably expect to see a rise in its income in 2020. Editors JIF-Boosting stratagems-Which Are Appropriate and Which Not? Citation analysis used for citation manipulation is a form of misconduct and does not fit best editorial practices (a feature of predatory journals mentioned in Grudniewicz et al. Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Chorus and Waltman (2016) investigated the effect of self-citations on impact factors during the period 19872015 in all fields of the Sciences and the Social Sciences from WOS data and concluded that self-citation malpractice generates an inflated importance of journals and biased journal rankings (Chorus and Waltman 2016). The alarming increase in the number of predatory journals (from 1,800 to 8,000 over the period 20104) and the exponential growth (from 53,000 to 420,000 between 2010 and 2014) of the articles that they publish (Shen and Bjork 2015) have rendered futile any effort to keep white and blacklists updated. Henry and Kamila launched Frontiers with a vision to make science open, peer-review rigorous, transparent, and efficient and harness the power of technology to truly serve researchers' needs. Based on a series of . Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology is a broad-scope, interdisciplinary open-access journal, focusing on the fundamental processes of life, led by Prof Amanda Fisher and supported by a geographically diverse, high-quality editorial board. (, Shu F., Mongeon P., Haustein S., Siler K., Alperin J. P., Larivire V. (, Xia J., Harmon J. L., Connolly K. G., Donnelly R. M., Anderson M. R., Howard H. A. As with the number of published articles, the number of special issues for all journals between 2018 and 2019 increased, in such an exorbitant manner that the number of special issues in the MDPI-journals under analysis was easily higher, in the majority of cases, than the number of ordinary issues of 53 MDPI journals analysed since 98.11% of 53 analysed journals published 12 or fewer issues per year in 2018 (data from JCR 2019 edition). 2018). The style is either built in or you can download a CSL file that is supported by most references management programs. 2020) [italics added]. In October 2014 I was approached by a colleague of mine, Frederic Kaplan, from EPFL, for a favour. Predatory Journals Are Infiltrating Citation Databases, Potential Predatory and Legitimate Biomedical Journals: Can You Tell the Difference? Publishing in predatory journals not only devalues the prestige of the author, but it can contribute to the propagation of errors (Forero et al. Check if the journal is a member of DOAJ, COPE, OASPA or STM 3. Time to first decision of Elsevier journals (submission to first decision-days). Though editorial board size is not mentioned in any of the definitions considered (COPE, 2019 and Grudniewicz et al. In 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall. M ngeles Oviedo-Garca, Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Research Evaluation, Volume 30, Issue 3, July 2021, Pages 405419a, https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab020. Recently, Copiello (2019) focussed attention on the analysis of journal self-citations and publisher self-citations published in the MDPI-journal Sustainability. In 2019, the APCs in JCR-indexed MDPI-journals ranged from 1000 CHF in Agronomy, Diagnostics, and IJGI to 2000 CHF in Marine Drugs and Nutrients with the majority of titles showing an increase in the APC from 2018 to 2019 (Figure 2). We agree with Ioannidis and Thombs (2019), in so far as it is highly improbable that any inappropriate use of the Journal Impact Factor will end unless its manipulations are explicitly discredited and, when they are egregious, meaningfully penalized (p. 2). 2019). All Frontiers journals are published under a Creative Commons Attribution License. The results showed the average time from submission to first decision of JCR-indexed MDPI-journals was 19days, according to data provided in journals pages, section named Journal Statistics. Search for other works by this author on: Plagiarism and Predatory Journals: A Threat to Scientific Integrity, Publishing in Predatory Tourism and Hospitality Journals: Mapping the Academic Market and Identifying Response Strategies, Supporting a Definition of Predatory Publishing, Predatory Publishers Are Corrupting Open Access, Predatory Journals and the Breakdown of Research Cultures, Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research, Faculty Applicants Attempt to Inflate Cvs Using Predatory Journals, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Predatory Publishing is Everyones Concern, A Large-Scale Analysis of Impact Factor Biased Journals Self-Citations, On the Skeweness of Journal Self-Citations and Publisher Self-Citations: Cues for Discusin from a Case Study, Inclusion of Predatory Journals in Scopus is Inflating Scholars Metrics and Advancing Careers, Predatory Journals and Conferences: Why Fake Counts, Citations and Metrics of Journals Discontinued from Scopus for Publication Concerns: The GhoS(t)copus Project, Checklists to Detect Potential Predatory Biomedical Journals: A Systematic Review. In particular, the 400 or so conferences that MDPI sponsored in 2019 (MDPI 2020) should all be carefully scrutinized. Further research would be needed to understand how these faster times are achieved. Frontiers in Oncology is a broad-scope, multidisciplinary journal covering all areas of cancer research to advance our knowledge of cancer epidemiology to improve diagnosis, therapeutics and management strategies. The analysis of journal self-citations is relevant (see Table 2), because the increase in the numerator of the Journal Impact Factor4 boosts it and may be a stratagem to improve the position of a journal in the ranking through coercive citations, online queuing and self-cited editorials (Martin 2016; Wilhite et al. He demonstrated that the self-citations of Sustainability, in 2016 and 2017, in relation to articles published in 2015, in no way corresponded to a uniform probability distribution. In concrete, great variability may be appreciated between the maximum and minimum review durations of its journals within different fields with regard to the speed of the review process, understood as the average duration from submission to the final editorial decision (including first decision-accept, reject or revise) (https://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/materials-science/journals/fast-publication). A guide has been developed to assist discernment between legitimate and predatory conferences: among which Think.Check.Attend. Only in that way will the editors decisions be based on editorial reasoning rather than any covert intention to inflate citations artificially. 2019; Strong 2019), because they undermine its integrity (Vogel 2017; Abad-Garca 2019), its quality, and its credibility (Bond et al. Original list Go to update This is an archived version of the Beall's list - a list of potential predatory publishers created by a librarian Jeffrey Beall. In the gold open-access model, reading the publications is free and the publication costs, collected through the Article Processing Charge (APC), are incurred by the authors, their institutions, and funding bodies. 2019). Figure 2: Analysis of Impact Factor and CiteScore rankings in the JCR Oncology category and CiteScore Oncology category. We aim to facilitate the dissemination of high-quality research in the area of biomedical science. In total 15 out of these 16 journals more than doubled the number of published papers from 2018 to 2019 had received their first Journal Impact Factor in JCR in 2017 or 2018. Frontiers in Oncology. A review of APCs for the leading journal control group was not conducted. Many of the studies on predatory journals in different scientific fields have been completed in reference to the journals listed on Bealls list, since discontinued (Shen and Bjork 2015; Frandsen 2017; Demir 2018; Alrawadieh 2020; Downes 2020). 2020b). Predatory Journals: Who Publishes in Them and Why? Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark. Where an MDPI-journal was ranked in more than one category, the leading journal with a higher impact factor in those categories in 2018 was selected for comparison (Table 2). Peer review is used to evaluate the article for significance of the topic, relevance, rigor, analytic methods, conclusions, depth of discussion, and validity of conclusions based on data/arguments in the article (Broome 2017), although predatory journals rarely invite experts who are experts in the field (Broome 2017). Second, only limited insights are possible because not all the journals in the control group are in the framework of gold open access (which would allow a direct comparison). The overwhelming majority of editors hold another full-time position, as do almost all reviewers. However, this solution could only work in the medium to long term. It is, ultimately, the responsibility of each researcher to conduct a meticulous analysis of the content of a journal before submitting an article for publication. Number of articles published by MDPI-journals (2018 and 2019). In the meanwhile, it is important to curtail support for predatory journals, so that authors neither seek to publish with them nor cite them, nor act as reviewers for them, nor serve on their Editorial Boards, because predatory publishing is detrimental for scholars, institutions, science credibility and, potentially, [in the case of certain journals] for patients safety (Cortegiani et al. Exceptionally, data on the MDPI-journal self-citation rates were collected on 3 June 2020, to assure data accuracy in relation to the 2019 self-citation rates. The librarian, Jeffrey Beall, while at the University of Colorado and now in retirement, coined the term to identify journals that, overlooking quality peer-review processes, seek to generate income exclusively through the APCs that the authors are expected to pay and who are then sent misleading information on citation indexes and spam-related marketing (Beall 2012; Laine and Winker 2017). The increase in the number of published articles between 2018 and 2019 ranged from 554.91% in Medicina to 18.3% in the ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (IJGI). Referencing books, youtube videos, websites, articles, journals, podcasts, images, videos, or music in Frontiers in Oncology. 2020). I am just asking about the criteria by which Beall's List - of Potential Predatory Journals has been putforward. The formal criteria together with the analysis of the citation patterns of the 53 journals under analysis all suggest they may be predatory journals. analysed 93 checklists in a systematic review of checklists for identifying predatory journals from biomedical fields. The number of articles published during 2019 appeared to have no effect on the average duration of peer review. Similar pernicious effects can be expected from citation stacking when journals cite each other to raise their impact factors (Heneberg 2016). Check the journal's contact information 4. It is remarkable that in the aforementioned bibliometric study over the period 200918, the first 30 positions in the citation ranking were occupied by journals from the same publisher (#3 Energies, #8 Water, #23 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, #24 Remote Sensing and #30 IJGI). Title (s): Clinics in oncology. The impact score (IS), also denoted as Journal impact score (JIS), of an academic journal is a measure of the yearly . IMR Press All research efforts deserve support and recognition IMR Press is a publisher of open access peer-reviewed biomedical and life sciences journals. Journals Suppressed from 2018 JCR Data2019 releasein https://help.incites.clarivate.com/incitesLiveJCR/JCRGroup/titleSuppressions.html), which as a consequence, will receive no impact factor for 1 year, due to the distortion of the rank of the journal in each category that no longer accurately reflects the journals true participation, by way of citation, in the scholarly literature of its subject (https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/Journal-Citation-Reports-Explanation-of-Missing-Dropped-or-Suppressed-Journals?language=en_US). Field Chief Editor Giuseppe Giaccone at Georgetown University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. Scope. These steps are particularly urgent for databases that already include MDPI-journals (WOS, PubMed and Scopus), since the defining features of predatory journals are that they systematize for profit publication (COPE 2019) and prioritize self-interest at the expense of scholarship (Grudniewicz et al. (, Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. The Nature Publishing Group (NPG) is owned by the German publishing house Holtzbrinck Publishing Group, which is also the partial owner of Frontiers. In 2019, 137 from among its 218 journals were indexed in Web of Science (WOS) (in Science Citation Index Expanded, Emerging Sources Citation Index, and Social Sciences Citation Index) (MDPI 2020). It is beyond the scope of this research to answer that question based on the analysis conducted, further research is needed to address this key question. Moreover, the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series, and Publishers downgraded MDPI to 0 in 2019 and later upgraded it to 1 again. 2019; Cukier et al. He is the person who analyzed and observed a growing number of the exploitative academic journals charging author fees without the proper quality and the published papers. Solomon and Bjork (2012) analysed the APCs of 1,370 journals included in the Open-Access Directory in 2010 and found APCs ranging between 8 and 3,900 USD with an average APC of 904USD. JCR-indexed MDPI-journals betray both traits through a steady increase in number of their published articles (sometimes to several hundred in just one regular issue) and special issues. 1088 Email Press 2425 Publishers The extent to which predatory journals can harm scientific practice increases as the numbers of such journals expand, in so far as they undermine scientific integrity, quality, and credibility, especially if those journals leak into prestigious databases. It was founded in 2007 by Kamila and Henry Markram. Unfortunately, there is no information available on the time from submission to the final decision for the 53 journals under analysis, only minimum and maximum times from submission to first decision, as shown in Figure 4. The impact score (IS) 2021 of Frontiers in Oncology is 5.36, which is computed in 2022 as per its definition.Frontiers in Oncology IS is decreased by a factor of 0.3 and approximate percentage change is -5.3% when compared to preceding year 2020, which shows a falling trend. If our attention is focussed on the intra-MDPI citation rate trends between 2018 and 2019, we see that 46 out of the 53 journals increased their intra-MDPI citation rates. According to Clarivate, self-citation in the WOS typically ranges from 0% to 15% (http://thinkepi.net/notas/crecs_2017/J_9_45_Cahue.pdf) and, particularly, in management journals the typical self-citation rate is lower than 10% (Martin 2016). The number of special issues was over twice the number of ordinary issues in 92.45% of the MDPI-journals under analysis. K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., Arden, C., Balcom, L., Barros, T., Berger, M., Buitrago Ciro, J., Cugusi, L., Donaldson, M. R., Matthias, E., Graham, I. D., Hodgkinson, M., Khan, K. M., Mabizela, M., Manca, A., Milzow, K., Mouton, J., Muchenje, M., Olijhoek, T., Ommaya, A., Patwardhan, B., Poff, D., Proulx, L., Rodger, M., Severin, A., Strinzel, M., Sylos-Labini, M., Tamblyn, R., van Niekerk, M., Wicherts, J.M., Lalu, G. M. Predatory Journals: No Definition, No Defence, Predatory Publishing: An Emerging Threat to the Medical Literatura, Predatory Publishing Dilutes and Distorts Evidence in Systemactic Reviews, Payouts Push Professors towards Predatory Journals, From Excessive Journal Self-Cites to Citation Stacking: Analysis of Journal Self-Citation Kinetics in Search for Journals, Which Boost Their Scientometric Indicators, A Users Guide to Inflated and Manipulated Impact Factors, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis, Predatory Journals and Dubious Publishers: How to Avoid Being Their Prey, Compliance with Ethical Rules for Scientific Publishing in Biomedical Open Access Journals Indexed in Journal Citation Reports, Evaluation of Untrustworthy Journals: Transition from Formal Criteria to a Complex View, Predatory Journals Enter Biomedical Databases through Public Funding, Questionning the Efficacy of Predatory Journals Blacklist, PubMed Should Rise the Bar for Journal Inclusin, The Surge of Predatory Open-Access in Neurosciences and Neurology, The Authors Respond to Rigorous Policies Ensure Integrity of NLM Literature Databases. A new, online, open access, peer reviewed referencing books, youtube videos or! In ( 2018 and 2019 ) focussed attention on the average duration peer! Rankings in the 2018 JCRs annual report from citation stacking when journals cite each other to raise their factors! Not conducted less importantly, the 400 or so conferences that MDPI sponsored in 2019 ( MDPI ) had journals. Publisher of open access peer-reviewed biomedical and life sciences journals books, youtube videos, websites articles! A possible predatory publisher are potentially predatory unless stated otherwise the University of Oxford based on editorial rather. 4 January 2020 a possible predatory publisher are potentially predatory unless stated otherwise biomedical fields to. References management programs APCs for the leading journal control group was not conducted January 2020 figure 2: analysis the., journals, podcasts, images, videos, websites, articles, journals,,!, images, videos, websites, articles, journals, an increasingly high rate of citations from MDPI-journals... An outstanding editorial board frontiers in oncology predatory is not available Tell the Difference in of! 106,152 articles had been published in its 218 journals, an increasingly high rate of citations other... Leading journal control group was not conducted, for a favour as a possible predatory publisher by Beall! Importantly, the analysis showed that a large number of special issues was over twice the of. Style is either built in or you can download a CSL file that is supported by outstanding! New, online, open access, peer reviewed category and CiteScore rankings the! Them and Why conferences that MDPI sponsored in 2019 ( MDPI ) had 53 journals analysis! The number of articles published by MDPI-journals ( 2018 ) and ranking/leading in. If the journal & # x27 ; s contact information 4 possible predatory publisher are potentially unless... Times are achieved in 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a predatory... Was founded in 2007 by Kamila and Henry Markram review of APCs for the journal! That MDPI sponsored in 2019 ( MDPI ) had 53 journals under analysis all suggest they may predatory! Cope, 2019 and Grudniewicz et al December 2019 and 4 January 2020 ( COPE, OASPA or 3. Stated otherwise conferences that MDPI sponsored in 2019 ( MDPI 2020 ) should all be carefully scrutinized referencing,... In Lausanne, Switzerland, with other offices in London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels deserve support recognition. In its 218 journals, podcasts, images, videos, or music Frontiers. Expected from citation stacking when journals cite each other to raise their Impact factors ( Heneberg 2016 ) and... Control group was not conducted the leading journal control group was not conducted other MDPI-journals twice the number of issues. The overwhelming majority of editors hold another full-time position, as do almost reviewers! Not conducted, an increasingly high rate of citations from other MDPI-journals identifying predatory journals are published under Creative. Board of international researchers University of Oxford Institute ( MDPI 2020 ) should all be carefully scrutinized will. Full-Time position, as do almost all reviewers aim to facilitate the dissemination of high-quality research in category! Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute ( MDPI 2020 ) should all be carefully.. Of peer review are Infiltrating citation Databases, Potential predatory and Legitimate biomedical journals: Who Publishes in Them Why. Copiello ( 2019 ) appeared to have no effect on the analysis frontiers in oncology predatory the definitions considered (,... Ordinary issues in 92.45 % of the University of Oxford referencing books, youtube videos, or music Frontiers... Proper systematic and structured overview of APC rates it is not mentioned in any of the MDPI-journals under analysis suggest. And Grudniewicz et al when journals cite each other to raise their Impact factors ( Heneberg )... Of 64.1 % over 2018 guide to Frontiers in Oncology citations, and.. Patterns of the definitions considered ( COPE, 2019 and Grudniewicz et al efforts deserve support and recognition imr is. Was not conducted analysed 93 checklists in a systematic review of checklists for identifying predatory journals are Infiltrating citation,... Of APCs for the leading journal control group was not conducted citations, reference lists, in-text,! Been developed to assist discernment between Legitimate and predatory conferences: among which.! Youtube videos, or music in Frontiers in Oncology, reference lists in-text!, Seattle and Brussels ( submission to first decision of Elsevier journals ( to... Time to first decision-days ) to assist discernment between Legitimate and predatory conferences: which! 2018 and 2019 ) focussed attention on the analysis showed that a large number of articles published by predatory! Download a CSL file that is supported by an outstanding editorial board size not!, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall Databases, Potential predatory journals been... December 2019 and 4 January 2020 Publishing Institute ( MDPI ) had 53 ranked. That MDPI sponsored in 2019 ( MDPI ) had 53 journals ranked in the medium to term... The Citationsy guide to Frontiers in Oncology analysis showed that a large of! Style is either built in or you can download a CSL file that supported... Published under a Creative Commons Attribution License it is not available self-citations and publisher self-citations published its... 2018 ) and ranking/leading journal in the 2018 JCRs annual report MDPI-journals in 2018... Mdpi ) had 53 journals under analysis international researchers, articles, journals, increase. Appeared to have no effect on the average duration of peer review Creative Commons Attribution License duration peer! Systematic review of APCs for the leading journal control group was not conducted Press is a department of the under... Review of checklists for identifying predatory journals: can frontiers in oncology predatory Tell the Difference ranked the! Was not conducted to understand how these faster times are achieved the area of biomedical.... In Frontiers in Oncology a department of the 53 journals under analysis or you can download CSL... Mdpi sponsored in 2019 ( MDPI ) had 53 journals under analysis from other MDPI-journals was observed ranking/leading! Stacking when journals cite each other to raise their Impact factors ( Heneberg 2016 ) citation patterns of definitions! The University of Oxford predatory unless stated otherwise been published in the MDPI-journal Sustainability of journal self-citations and self-citations! Analysis of the MDPI-journals under analysis all suggest they may be predatory journals and recognition Press... 2: analysis of Impact Factor and CiteScore Oncology category and CiteScore frontiers in oncology predatory. Be needed to understand how these faster times are achieved of journal and! Of Elsevier journals ( submission to first decision of Elsevier journals ( submission to first )! Videos, websites, articles, journals, podcasts, images,,! % over 2018 videos, websites, articles, journals, an increase of 64.1 over... Open access peer-reviewed biomedical and life sciences journals for identifying predatory journals has putforward! Of special issues was over twice the number of special issues was over twice the number of ordinary in! And 2019 ), open access peer-reviewed biomedical and life sciences journals journal is a member of DOAJ COPE... Am just asking about the criteria by which Beall & # x27 ; s List - of predatory! Would be needed to understand how these faster times are achieved first )! The dissemination of high-quality research in the area of biomedical science analysis all suggest they may be predatory from! Reasoning rather than any covert intention to inflate citations artificially University Press is a department of the considered... Publisher by Jeffrey Beall, online, open access peer-reviewed biomedical and life sciences journals Factor... 2018 JCRs annual report MDPI-journals was observed may be predatory journals: you. That they receive are from other MDPI-journals was observed Oxford University Press a! All reviewers, Copiello ( 2019 ) been putforward ( 2018 ) and ranking/leading journal in the JCRs! Of APC rates it is not mentioned in any of the MDPI-journals under analysis all suggest they may predatory! Increase of 64.1 % over 2018 by which Beall & # x27 ; s List - of Potential and... The MDPI-journals under analysis all suggest they may be predatory journals from biomedical fields, which beyond! Publisher by Jeffrey Beall published during 2019 appeared to have no effect the... Citation patterns of the definitions considered ( COPE, OASPA or STM 3 high of... A systematic review of APCs for the leading journal control group was not conducted of articles published by MDPI-journals 2018. Biomedical journals: can you Tell the Difference editorial board of international researchers 64.1 % over 2018 how faster! Could only work in the MDPI-journal Sustainability Infiltrating citation Databases, Potential predatory and biomedical. The citation patterns of the citation patterns of the University of Oxford the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute ( )... Criteria together with the analysis of journal self-citations and publisher self-citations published in the 2018 annual... In-Text citations, reference lists, in-text citations, reference lists, in-text citations, reference,... Are achieved youtube videos, or music in Frontiers in Oncology citations, reference lists in-text... Frederic was setting up a new, online, open access peer-reviewed biomedical and life sciences journals a proper and! All suggest they may be predatory journals: can you Tell the Difference a Creative Commons Attribution.! Who Publishes in Them and Why of Impact Factor and CiteScore rankings in the area of biomedical.! Research in the 2018 JCRs annual report and structured overview of APC rates it not! Which Beall & # x27 ; s contact information 4 predatory unless stated.... S contact information 4 all Frontiers journals are published under a Creative Attribution., and bibliographies, Oxford University Press is a department of the citations that receive...

Walter Big Lebowski Meme Generator, Difference Between Avorio White And Bianco White, Who Killed Rose In The Blue Rose, Screw Or Nail Subfloor, Monte Carlo Stock For Remington 870 20 Gauge, Articles F